Cases 31 - 40 of 224
Hicks v. Griffin et al
as 4:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Joe Griffin, James Moody, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarell Terry v. James Dycus, et al
as 22-2396
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jarell Davis Terry
Defendant:
James Dycus, Warden, ADC, Danny Norment, Sgt., ADC, Morieon Kelly, Sgt., ADC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Sykes, Sergeant and John Munn
Reginald Dunahue v. Jeremy Andrews, et al
as 22-2311
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reginald L. Dunahue
Defendant / Appellee:
Jeremy C. Andrews, Warden, ADC, Franklin Graham, Lieutenant, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Stacy Roebuck, Law Library Supervisor, EARU, ADC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Wendy Kelley, Director, ADC
Graham v. U.S. Congress of United States
as 4:2022cv00616
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Ernest Graham
Defendant:
U.S. Congress of United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. USP-McCreary et al
as 0:2022cv01041
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
USP-McCreary and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Graham v. Gilley
as 0:2022cv00748
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
Warden Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Clem v. Counts et al
as 4:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Neil Clem
Defendant:
Anthony Counts, Holden Lester, Darren White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Graham v. U.S. Marshal
as 22-1005
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Charles Graham
Respondent / Appellee:
U.S. Marshal, on behalf of USA
Graham v. USA
as 0:2021cv02419
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Graham v. U.S. Marshal
as 0:2021cv01716
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
