Cases 31 - 40 of 4,795
Lundy v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Rossi Byron Lundy, Jr. and Rossi Byron Lundy, Jr
Defendant:
Tracy Johnson, Steve Warner, Michael Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Burgess v. State of Missouri, et al
as 24-1731
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Burgess
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Buchanan County, Missouri, City of St. Joseph, Missouri and others
Michael Titus v. Scarface, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus, ADC #168523
Defendant:
Scarface, Movie, Al Pacino, Director of Scarface, Keef Coff Group and others
Webb v. USA
as 4:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Michael B Webb, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Michael Scales v. United States
as 24-1704
Petitioner:
Michael Scales
Respondent:
United States of America
Burgess v. City of St Joseph, Missouri et al
as 5:2024cv06050
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Burgess
Defendant:
City of St Joseph, Missouri, St. Joseph Police Department, Officer Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merrival v. Pennington County et al
as 4:2024cv04064
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Merrival, Jr.
Defendant:
Pennington County, Kellie Wasko, Amber Pirraglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glasgow v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Shannon M Glasgow
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Local Officials, Federal Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. White Castle et al
as 4:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
White Castle, Bank of America, Sparks Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liscomb v. Randel et al
as 4:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Liscomb
Defendant:
Kenyen Randel, Antonio D Johnson, Jr, Tod Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
