Cases 41 - 50 of 3,968
Parker v. Polk County Jail et al
as 4:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Parker, Jr.
Defendant:
Polk County Jail and Teresa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Phillips et al
as 1:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Donald E. Phillips, Brian George, Michael L. Parson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephen Plunkett v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1639
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, Collette Peters, John P. Yates, Warden and others
Pollard-El Jr. v. Allen et al
as 4:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Byron Pollard-El Jr.
Defendant:
Richard Adams Allen and Unknown Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Todd v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Frazier Todd, Jr
Defendant:
Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pollard-El Jr. v. Allen et al
as 4:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Byron Pollard-El Jr.
Defendant:
Richard Adam Allen and Unknown Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobo v. USA
as 0:2024cv00988
Petitioner:
Theodore Harold Edward Bobo, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bruce Smith, Jr. v. SD Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1551
Plaintiff:
Bruce Edgar Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
South Dakota Department of Corrections, Douglas L. Weber, Warden, Laura May, Coordinator of STOP and others
Clemons v. Jones (#126) et al
as 6:2024cv06026
Plaintiff:
Ovell Daniel Clemons, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Jones (#126), Officer Smith (#153), Officer McSlone (#118) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Norman Shaw and Norman Shaw, Jr
Defendant:
Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
