Cases 41 - 50 of 2,264
Beyer v. Rardin et al
as 0:2023cv03770
Plaintiff:
Brandon Beyer
Defendant:
Jared Rardin, H. Hanson, Nancy Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manos v. Nodaway County Sheriff et al
as 4:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
STACEY E MANOS
Defendant:
NODAWAY COUNTY SHERIFF, JOHN DOE #1, DIRECTOR OF JAIL, COUNTY OF NODAWAY, MISSOURI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Prince v. Curry
as 2:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Moneka Prince
Defendant:
Scott E. Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Hale et al
as 4:2023cv01142
Plaintiff:
Jaylen M Lewis
Defendant:
E Hale and A Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Potter v. St. Charles County et al
as 4:2023cv01511
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Potter
Defendant:
St. Charles County, St. Charles County Prosecuting Attorney Office, St. Charles County Counselor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Williams
as 6:2023cv03356
Petitioner:
Matthew Davis
Respondent:
E Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Weathers v. Jeffreys et al
as 8:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Brandon J. Weathers
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Taggert Boyd, E. Staiger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mcswine v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2023cv00488
Petitioner:
Fredrick E. Mcswine
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Greer v. Williams
as 6:2023cv03344
Petitioner:
Albert Greer
Respondent:
E Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Denny v. Dent County Jail et al
as 4:2023cv01330
Plaintiff:
James E. Denny
Defendant:
Dent County Jail and Bobby D. Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
