Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Murlin Phillips v. Missouri Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 12-2148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Murlin R. Phillips
Defendant - Appellee:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Dave Dormire, Jerry B. Lange and others
Roberts v. Ruppel et al
as 2:2012cv04054
Plaintiff:
Maurice D Roberts
Defendant:
Edward Ruppel, Clifton Bowen, David Dormire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Prater-Wilson et al
as 2:2012cv04056
Plaintiff:
Maurice D Roberts
Defendant:
Joann Prater-Wilson, Webb, Rollins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Arnold et al
as 3:2011cv00104
Plaintiff:
Joseph N Bowen
Defendant:
Paulett Arnold, Larry Mills, Becky Hitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wery v. NDDOCR et al
as 1:2011cv00023
Plaintiff:
Amy M Wery
Defendant:
NDDOCR, DWCRC, SWMCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammock v. Dormire et al
as 2:2011cv04034
Plaintiff:
Teddy Hammock
Defendant:
Dave Dormire, Clifton Bowen , Amanda Wilbers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baghazal v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv04281
Plaintiff:
Mohsin Baghazal
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Mike Kemna, Patricia Cornell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fredrick Davis v. State of Missouri, et al
as 10-2900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fredrick James Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Missouri, Governor Nixon, Boonville Correctional Center and others
Davis v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2010cv01332
Plaintiff:
Fredrick James Davis
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Governor Nixon, Boonville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv04054
Plaintiff:
Murlin R Phillips
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Dave Dormire, Jerry B Lange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
