Cases 41 - 50 of 342
Bailey v. Yates et al
as 1:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Phillip Bailey
Defendant:
Jeremy Yates, Unknown Officer and Dunklin County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Case et al
as 3:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Noah J King
Defendant:
Robert Case, Bailey Burns, Brianna Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Does
as 3:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dewayne Malone, Sr
Defendant:
Does, Does Officer Jaimie, Robert Case and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Billy Bailey v. Centurion Medical Co., et al
as 22-2339
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Billy Bailey
Defendant:
The Minnesota Department of Corrections
Defendant / Appellee:
The Centurion Medical Co. Corporation of Minnesota, Nanette Larson, Tina Sneen and others
Trent-Kettlekamp v. Vandergriff
as 2:2022cv04096
Petitioner:
Bailey Trent-Kettlekamp
Respondent:
Warden David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Greene County, Missouri et al
as 6:2022cv03150
Plaintiff:
Bradley Eugene Bailey
Defendant:
Greene County, Missouri, Greene County Justice Center (Jail), Greene County Prosecuting Attorneys Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucas v. Case et al
as 3:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
William M Lucas
Defendant:
Robert Case, Bailey Burns, Mandi Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Newbron et al
as 4:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dashan Bailey
Defendant:
K Newbron and Mcuen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Cobbs et al
as 4:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dashan Bailey
Defendant:
Cobbs, White and West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Earls v. Franks et al
as 3:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jacob Thomas Earls
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Ashley Worcester, Shane Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
