Cases 41 - 50 of 354
King v. Jesse
as 4:2023cv00475
Plaintiff:
Mary King
Defendant:
Mark Jesse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ighovojah v. Pugh
as 0:2023cv01398
Petitioner:
Suvwe Peter Ighovojah
Respondent:
Jesse Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Talbert v. Thomas
as 0:2023cv01284
Petitioner:
Jesse L. Talbert
Respondent:
Acting Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Munt v. Pugh
as 0:2023cv01268
Petitioner:
Joel Marvin Munt
Respondent:
Jesse Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McAfee v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Michael McAfee
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Wesley Bell, Frederick Lemons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Engle v. Bell et al
as 4:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Shane Ray Engle
Defendant:
Jesse Bell, Richard McNamee and Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Eberhardt et al
as 8:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Kevin G. Smith
Defendant:
Rick Eberhardt, Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Pugh
as 0:2023cv00884
Petitioner:
Chad Nicholas Nelson
Respondent:
Jesse Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adam Hill v. Sarah Crawford, et al
as 23-1633
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adam Hill
Defendant / Appellee:
Sarah Crawford, Nurse and Carol Johnson, Sergeant, Grimes Unit, ADC
Defendant:
Marjorie Hall, Health Administrator, Correctional Care Solutions, Susan Hutson, Director of Nursing, Correctional Care Solutions, Sarah Brewer, Nurse, Correctional Care Solutions and others
James v. Pugh
as 0:2023cv00572
Petitioner:
Eddie K. James
Respondent:
Jesse Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
