Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Carmichael v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 0:2010cv04866
Plaintiff:
Kenja O. Carmichael
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, F.B.I., United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dumarce v. Roberts County Jail et al
as 1:2010cv01023
Plaintiff:
Sampson Dumarce, Jr.
Defendant:
Roberts County Jail and United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solomon v. The United States Marshal Service et al
as 5:2010cv05163
Plaintiff:
James Clayton Solomon
Defendant:
The United States Marshal Service, Hunter Petray, Keith Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. United States of America et al
as 6:2009cv03141
Plaintiff:
Billy Boyd Thompson
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Marshals Service, Greene County Justice Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobby Olles v. Larry Norris, et al
as 08-2871
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bobby Joe Olles
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Harley Lappin, Ray Carnahan, United States Marshal Service and others
Kral v. United States Marshal Services
as 0:2008cv00560
Petitioner:
David J. Kral
Respondent:
United States Marshal Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sandell v. Polk County et al
as 4:2007cv00531
Plaintiff:
Mark Sandell
Defendant:
Polk County, Polk County Jail, Polk County Jail Medical Department Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. United States Marshal Service
as 4:2007cv01893
Petitioner:
Brian K. Phillips
Respondent:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Yah v. Ennis et al
as 8:2007cv00272
Plaintiff:
M,A, Yah
Defendant:
Brian Ennis and United States Marshalls Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
