Cases 61 - 70 of 268
Smith v. Arnett, et al
as 2:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Dennis James Smith, Sr
Defendant:
Calvin Arnett, Dexter Payne, Vickey Haycox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamner v. Lay et al
as 2:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamner
Defendant:
Rex Lay, Christopher Johnson, M Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawley v. Richardson et al
as 2:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Donald Hawley
Defendant:
Richardson and Randle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conley v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
Gary Lynn Conley
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, Dextar Payne, Kenyon V Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCartney v. Curl et al
as 4:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Rick L McCartney
Defendant:
Chase Curl, Zack Sebree, Aaron Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. McGinnis
as 3:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Angela Richardson
Defendant:
Dennis McGinnis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copeland v. Hefner et al
as 1:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Richardson Copeland
Defendant:
Carl Hefner and Andy Holder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00075
Petitioner:
Anthony Donte Richardson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Darden v. St. Louis Airport and City Dept. et al
as 4:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Dominique Darden
Defendant:
St. Louis Airport and City Dept., Lt. Unknown Thomas, Lt. Unknown Bruce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Richardson v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
Angela Schuncey Richardson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Keith Waddle, Toni Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
