Cases 81 - 90 of 4,875
Shawn Duncan v. Joshua Tessier, et al
as 24-1481
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kenya Duncan
Defendant:
Joshua Tessier, Head Practitioner, Naphcare, Polk County Jail and others
Lemke v. Skinner et al
as 4:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Lemke and Angel Marie
Defendant:
Beth Skinner, Jerome Greenfield, Nichole Francis and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kidd v. Does
as 4:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Raymond Kidd
Defendant:
Does and Yell County Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. John Doe Staff Member
as 5:2024cv05052
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
John Doe Staff Member
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayfield v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
William Mayfield
Defendant:
Doe and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Slater et al v. Buckner et al
as 6:2024cv03064
Plaintiff:
Joshua R Slater and Jermaine McDaniels
Defendant:
Michele Buckner, Heath Cantrell, Smith Billy William and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Randle et al
as 4:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Ellis
Defendant:
Kenyon Randle and Does Lieutenant, E.A.R.U. Max; Mental Health Doctor, Central Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Tallant et al
as 4:2024cv04020
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wayne Dale Smith, Jr and Curtis Wayne Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Jana Tallant, John or Jane Doe Administrative Staff, Jailer Landon Tollette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinonez Venegas v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Sergio Ivan Quinonez Venegas
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
