Cases 81 - 90 of 409
Williamson v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01161
Plaintiff:
Maurice Williamson
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Potter v. Jones et al
as 4:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Jason M Potter
Defendant:
Andrew Jones, City of Lee's Summit, Lee's Summit Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter-Loftin v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Cameron Hunter-Loftin
Defendant:
USA, Doe and Dewayne Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Scott v. Hunter et al
as 4:2022cv00804
Plaintiff:
Brandon D Scott
Defendant:
Hunter and Pulaski County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Green et al
as 4:2022cv00633
Plaintiff:
Telvin Rashad Willis
Defendant:
Phillip Green, Kyle Hunter and Clint Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Marshall et al
as 3:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Clarence Anderson
Defendant:
Patricia Marshall, Ron Hunter, Regina Hindman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Addison v. Marshall et al
as 3:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Tristin Addison
Defendant:
Patricia Marshall, Ron Hunter, Regina Hindman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Marshall et al
as 3:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Steven Chandler
Defendant:
Patricia Marshall, Ron Hunter, Regina Hindman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Marshall et al
as 3:2022cv00613
Plaintiff:
Clarence Anderson
Defendant:
Patricia Marshall, Ron Hunter, Regina Hindman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Davison et al
as 3:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
Clarence Anderson
Defendant:
Davison, Tyler Robinson, Cagel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
