Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Rankins v. Tessier et al
as 4:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Marain Larayonda Rankins
Defendant:
Dr. Tessier, Dr. Stacy, NaphCare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankins v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Marain Larayonda Rankins
Defendant:
State of Iowa, Polk County Sheriff's Office, Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roderick Rankin v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roderick Leshun Rankin
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Ray Hobbs)
Rankin v. Arkansas County Detention Center et al
as 2:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Alexander Rankin
Defendant:
Arkansas County Detention Center and Arkansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankins v. Pearson et al
as 3:2022cv03036
Plaintiff:
Danny Wayne Rankins
Defendant:
Cortney Pearson, Dimitrius Bowens, Boatman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankins v. Pearson et al
as 4:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
Danny Wayne Rankins
Defendant:
Cortney Pearson, Dimitrius Bowens, Boatman and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankins v. Elkens et al
as 6:2021cv06128
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lynn Rankins
Defendant:
Darril Elkens, Pike County Detention Center and Jail Administrator Sarah Haney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankins v. Haney et al
as 6:2021cv06117
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lynn Rankins
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Sarah Haney, Sheriff Travis Hill and Jason McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankins v. Hill
as 6:2021cv06103
Respondent:
Travis Hill
Petitioner:
Jeremy L. Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rankin v. Finch et al
as 1:2020cv00091
Defendant:
Unknown Prest, United States Marshals, Jason Finch and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Rankin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
