Cases 1 - 10 of 2,259
Fields v. Brown et al
as 4:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Timothy Xavier Fields
Defendant:
S Brown, J Miller, E Hester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Walton
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Adam A. Field and Gabriel E. Gore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Windeknecht v. Bullock et al
as 4:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Windeknecht
Defendant:
Mr. Christopher Bullock, Chief of St. Francois Police Dept., Mr. Michael Blake Dudley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Caruso v. USA
as 8:2024cv00087
Petitioner:
Timothy E. Caruso
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williamson v. State of North Dakota et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Robert Williamson
Defendant:
State of North Dakota, Chad Pringle, Dave Krabbenhoft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGown v. Gardner et al
as 4:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Sedric Lamont McGown
Defendant:
Ann E Gardner and Willard Proctor, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Omega Center
as 6:2024cv06056
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennis Ball-Bey v. Kyle Chandler, et al
as 24-1417
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ball-Bey
Defendant:
Kyle Chandler, Police Officer, in his individual capacity, Ronald E. Vaughn, Police Officer, in his individual capacity, Samuel Dotson, III, Former Police Chief and others
Landis v. Krabbenhoft
as 1:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Douglas E. Landis
Respondent:
Dave Krabbenhoft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mays v. USA
as 1:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Dorothy E. Mays
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
