Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Seidel v. Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 1:2017cv00038
Petitioner:
Zachary F. Seidel
Respondent:
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Standing Rock Agency and Sheila White Mountain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Garrett Jones v. John Egelhof, et al
as 16-2170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Garrett Lee Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
John Egelhof, Donavon Wind, Thomas B. Heffelfinger and others
Jones v. Egelhof et al
as 0:2015cv02679
Plaintiff:
Garrett Lee Jones
Defendant:
John Egelhof, Donavon Wind, Thomas B. Heffelfinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Halke et al
as 2:2013cv00060
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mike Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Clinton et al
as 4:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 12-2168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks, An American Indian
Defendant - Appellee:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Frederick Banks v. Bureau of Indian Affairs, et al
as 12-1858
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks
Defendant - Appellee:
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Commissioner and Director, Department of Interior, Secretary, Eric Holder, Department of Justice and others
Banks v. Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 2:2011cv00191
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of Interior, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demarais v. Bureau of Indian Affairs et al
as 4:2009cv00032
Plaintiff:
Lane Matthew Demarais
Defendant:
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Three Affiliated Tribes, Fort Berthold Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
