Cases 1 - 10 of 657
King v. Ramsey County Jail et al
as 0:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Arron Scott King, Sr
Defendant:
Ramsey County Jail and All Ramsey County Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Xia v. King
as 0:2024cv02000
Petitioner:
Zhijun Xia
Respondent:
Mark King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Jacobs et al
as 5:2024cv05078
Plaintiff:
Tony Santiago Martinez
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe Officers 1-8, Chief of Police Frank Gamble, Police Officer Jorden Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. King et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Adam Lane
Defendant:
Josephus J King, Jackson, Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randy Rindahl v. Tim Reisch, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Kimberley Malsam-Rysdon, Ex-Secretary of Health, Joan Adam, Interim Secretary of Health, Kristi Noem, Governor for the State of South Dakota and others
Michael Titus v. Scarface, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus, ADC #168523
Defendant:
Scarface, Movie, Al Pacino, Director of Scarface, Keef Coff Group and others
Barker v. Kelly et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Mark Barker
Defendant:
Morieon Kelly, D Mitchell, Scott Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tavron v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mose Jackson, III, M Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotter v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Daniel Trotter
Defendant:
Wendy Marie Miller, Whithney Conney, Howard Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ducasse v. King
as 0:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Hiram Ducasse, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
