Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Titus v. Gucci Store Franchise and Distribution et al
as 6:2024cv06040
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus and IamsuiTitus
Defendant:
Gucci Store Franchise and Distribution, Givendy Distribution, Back to the Future (the Movie) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. World Book et al
as 6:2024cv06039
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
World Book, Nike Distribution Centers, Craig Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. USA
as 0:2023cv03323
Petitioner:
Paris La Monte Hunter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hunter v. United States of America et al
as 0:2023cv02807
Petitioner:
Paris La Monte Hunter
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Paris Young v. United States
as 23-1551
Petitioner / Appellant:
Paris B. Young
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Young v. USA
as 4:2022cv00719
Petitioner:
Paris B Young
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McPeters v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv04247
Defendant:
Martin Rucker, Jeremy Heffner, Anita Laire and others
Plaintiff:
Paris D. McPeters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Linn County Jail
as 1:2020cv00109
Defendant:
Linn County Jail and Linn County Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Paris Dewonde Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Linn County Correctional Center et al
as 1:2020cv00074
Defendant:
Todd Wiemer, Linn County Correctional Center and Tyler Johnson
Plaintiff:
Paris D Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollingshed v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00190
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Paris Hollingshed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
