Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Rector v. Strid
as 2:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Kody D Rector
Respondent:
Myles Strid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnett v. Superintendent et al
as 4:2021cv01223
Plaintiff:
Brandon Barnett
Defendant:
Superintendent, Jamle Williams, Unknown McFarland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bellew v. Marshaik et al
as 4:2021cv00906
Plaintiff:
Garrette Bellew
Defendant:
D. Marshaik, Unknown Dennis, Unknown Crew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rector v. Stamps et al
as 2:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Rector
Defendant:
Ruanne Stamps, Lisa Pogue, Dean Minor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Reid v. Rory Griffin, et al
as 15-1678
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Andrew Reid
Defendant - Appellee:
Rory Griffin, Medical Director, Richard, Mental Health Psychiatrist, ADC, Wendy Kelley, Director, ADC and others
Smith v. Rector et al
as 5:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
Courtney Smith
Defendant:
Annie Rector, Robert Parker, Niya W Battles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw et al v. Rector et al
as 5:2014cv00304
Plaintiff:
Steven Shaw, Jessie Bunche, Quvondo Thrower and others
Defendant:
Margaret Rector, Wiscaver, Stephenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James May v. Richard, et al
as 14-2570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James C. May
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard, Dr., Arkansas Department of Correction, Dr. Robert Forrest, Diagnostic Unit, ADC, Wendy Kelley and others
Stricklin v. Kittrell et al
as 5:2014cv00092
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Stricklin
Defendant:
Albert Kittrell, R Mehta, K Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stricklin v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 5:2014cv00039
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Stricklin
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Correctional Medical Services Inc, Corizon Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
