Cases 1 - 10 of 1,923
Daniel Gallagher, Jr. v. Bradford Coleman, et al
as 24-2217
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Gallagher, Jr.
Defendant:
Bradford Coleman, Missouri State Public Defender and Matthew Mahaffey
Hartman v. Brininstool et al
as 8:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hartman
Defendant:
Sgt. Unknown Brininstool, Cpt. Unknown Thomas, Cpl. Unknown Ali and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Harmon et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Mark Porter
Defendant:
Zachery S Harmon, Thomas Hurst, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelby v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00759
Plaintiff:
Jimmy DeWayne Shelby
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, State of Missouri, Phyllis M. Byland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raybourn v. Centurion Medical Services, et al
as 5:2024cv06072
Plaintiff:
Connie Ann Raybourn
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Chris McBee, Todd Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soard v. Budnik et al
as 2:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Thomas Soard
Defendant:
Christopher Budnik, Tasha Griffin, McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. State of Iowa
as 4:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Andrew G. Thomas
Defendant:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Hill v. United States
as 24-2023
Petitioner:
William Thomas Hill
Respondent:
United States of America
Lee v. Huckabee et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Sarah Huckabee, Board of Correction, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beiza-Denova v. Hollenhorst
as 0:2024cv01718
Plaintiff:
Enahi Beiza-Denova
Defendant:
Thomas Hollenhorst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
