Cases 1 - 10 of 163
Wynn v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00181
Petitioner:
Clinton Andrew Wynn
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Turner v. Martin et al
as 4:2023cv04113
Plaintiff:
Clinton M. Turner
Defendant:
Sheriff Danny Martin, Steve Otwell, Karen Ghormley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Martin et al
as 4:2023cv01070
Plaintiff:
Clinton M Turner
Defendant:
Danny Martin, Steve Otwell, Karen Ghormley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fifer v. Ghormely et al
as 4:2023cv04088
Plaintiff:
Clinton Daral Fifer
Defendant:
Lieutenant Karen Ghormely, Jail Administrator Steve Otwell and Sheriff Danny Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delaney v. Pugh
as 0:2023cv01942
Petitioner:
Clinton Delaney
Respondent:
Jesse Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turner v. Otwell et al
as 4:2023cv04050
Plaintiff:
Clinton M. Turner
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Steve Otwell, Lieutenant Karen Ghormilly, Guard Ashley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollingsworth v. Karberg et al
as 1:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hollingsworth
Defendant:
Kris Karberg, Michelle Waddle, Tracy Dietsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Boyd et al
as 3:2022cv05094
Plaintiff:
Justin Todd Taylor
Defendant:
Danny Boyd, Clinton Bray, Randy Kalbough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clinton Wynn v. United States
as 22-3508
Petitioner / Appellant:
Clinton Andrew Wynn
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Magnus v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2022cv02706
Petitioner:
Clinton Rudy Magnus
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
