Cases 1 - 10 of 504
Jordan v. Watson et al
as 4:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Andrew James Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Det. Unknown Watson, Arnold Police Dept. and Jefferson County Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moseley v. Henderson et al
as 4:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Kelshaun D Moseley
Defendant:
Henderson, Watson, Ahka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Philhours et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Owen Watson
Defendant:
Randy Philhours and Mike Snell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rickie Tigue, Jr. v. Belcher, et al
as 24-1669
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lynn Tigue, Jr. and Rickie Lynn Tigue, Jr.
Defendant:
Belcher, RN, EARU, ADC, Gary Kerstein, EARU, ADC, Kelley, Lt., EARU, ADC and others
Watson v. Meyers
as 8:2024cv00166
Petitioner:
Marsavion Watson
Respondent:
Micheal Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tavron v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mose Jackson, III, M Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Watson et al
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
L Watson, Haywood and Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Parkins v. Deigarion Staten, et al
as 24-1814
Plaintiff:
Michael Justin Parkins
Defendant:
Deigarion M. Staten, Corporal, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Scott Taylor, Major, East Arkansas Regional Unit, Watson, Lt., East Arkansas Regional Unit and others
Garman v. Watson et al
as 4:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Challen Derek Garman
Defendant:
James Watson, Beth Skinner, Amber Davis and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Dowdy et al
as 4:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Darian L Watson
Defendant:
Dowdy, Howard, Nips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
