Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Gomez v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2024cv00709
Plaintiff:
Otoniel Gomez
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Com. Jennifer Clemons-Abdullah, Dep Com. Unknown Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Preston v. Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska et al
as 4:2024cv03090
Plaintiff:
Brenda L. Preston
Defendant:
Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska, Scotts Bluff County Adult Detention Center, Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Krepps v. United States
as 4:2024cv00322
Petitioner:
Brock D Krepps
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
bin Bey v. Brock et al
as 4:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Dreke bin Bey
Defendant:
Steve Brock, Chandra Jones and Tammy Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Van Loo
as 5:2024cv06020
Petitioner:
Larry White
Respondent:
Brock Van Loo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown'el v. Brock et al
as 4:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Dion Brown'el
Defendant:
Daniel C Brock, Phillip E Miller and Clayton Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gardner v. Precythe et al
as 2:2024cv04023
Plaintiff:
Nathan Gardner
Defendant:
Director Anne L. Precythe, Brock Van Loo, Aaron Joy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2023cv01718
Plaintiff:
Otoniel Gomez
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, St. Louis City Justice Center Administration, Correctional Officer Unknown Moton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jogaak v. Hoerer et al
as 4:2023cv04165
Plaintiff:
Jogaak Jogaak
Defendant:
Sheldon Hoerer, Jake Rohwer, Brock Wines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
