Cases 111 - 120 of 753
Lockhart v. Siloam Springs, Arkansas et al
as 5:2022cv05040
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lockhart
Defendant:
Siloam Springs, Arkansas, James Wilmet, Allan Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Runion et al
as 4:2022cv04023
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wade Jackson
Defendant:
Sheriff Jackie Runion, Warden Jeffie Walker, Captain G. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Andrews v. Johnson
as 4:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Adam Michael Andrews
Defendant:
Does, Brandon Johnson, Bryant Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Gorman et al
as 4:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
Corey Williams
Defendant:
Gorman and Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heard v. eStem Jr High et al
as 4:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Tamara Heard
Defendant:
eStem Jr High, John Bacon and Justin Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Graham et al v. Butterball, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02026
Plaintiff:
Chris Graham, Dennis Lassiter and Adam Crowder
Defendant:
Butterball, LLC, Christopher Marr, John Does 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Staeden v. Wright et al
as 4:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Adam Staeden
Defendant:
Rodney Wright, Tonya Parker, Philliph Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Massey et al
as 2:2022cv02014
Plaintiff:
Grayson Kash Jackson
Defendant:
Sheriff Jason Massey and Lisa Rutledge
Petitioner:
Benjamin Adam Winderweedle
Respondent:
Leslie Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCoy v. Tadlock et al
as 4:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Cymber Tadlock, S Kyle Hunter, Lafayette Woods, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2021cv00168
Plaintiff:
Garrian Adams
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
