Cases 121 - 130 of 221
Richard v. Tallent et al
as 4:2014cv04122
Plaintiff:
Latre Richard
Defendant:
Janna Tallent, Butch Morris, Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lambert v. Walker et al
as 3:2014cv00216
Plaintiff:
Robert Lambert
Defendant:
Donna Walker, Cassondra Williams, Katy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hill v. Robinson et al
as 5:2014cv05286
Plaintiff:
James Hill
Defendant:
Graham Robinson, Kyle Morris and Jennifer Laub
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard v. Tallent et al
as 4:2014cv00531
Plaintiff:
Latre Richard
Defendant:
Janna Tallent, Butch Morris, Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2014cv00314
Plaintiff:
Carl D Jackson
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs , Marvin Evans , William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrow v. Matthews et al
as 5:2014cv00285
Plaintiff:
Berry Morrow
Defendant:
Shelia Matthews, Stanley Robinson, Kendrick Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Malvern Diagnostic Center et al
as 1:2014cv00078
Plaintiff:
Mark Morris
Defendant:
Malvern Diagnostic Center, Ouachita River Correctional Unit, Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox et al v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Inc et al
as 4:2014cv00388
Plaintiff:
Phyliss Cox and Morris Cox
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Inc , Wells Fargo Bank NA , Wilson & Associates PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wright v. Hartwell et al
as 1:2014cv01037
Plaintiff:
Johnny L. Wright
Defendant:
Scott Hartwell, Aaron Morris and Carl Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooling & Applied Technology Inc v. Morris & Associates Inc
as 4:2014cv00368
Plaintiff:
Cooling & Applied Technology Inc
Defendant:
Morris & Associates Inc
Counter_claimant:
Morris & Associates Inc
Counter_defendant:
Cooling & Applied Technology Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
