Cases 171 - 180 of 349,794
William Hill v. United States
as 24-2023
Petitioner:
William Thomas Hill
Respondent:
United States of America
Marqus Patton v. Taggart Boyd, et al
as 24-2026
Plaintiff:
Marqus Patton
Defendant:
Taggart Boyd, Warden of the Reception and Treatment Center, Michael Hilgers, Nebraska Attorney General and Rob Jeffreys, Director of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Rickie Tigue, Jr. v. Moses Jackson, et al
as 24-2029
Plaintiff:
Rickie Lynn Tigue, Jr.
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Warden, EARU, Brickey's Max, Johnson, Warden, EARU, Brickey's Max, Allison, Major, EARU, Brickey's Max and others
Preston v. Equitable Financial Life Insurance Company
as 0:2024cv01841
Plaintiff:
Kenyetta Preston
Defendant:
Equitable Financial Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Meglio v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Gail Meglio
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Wendi Rodriguez
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Soar Athletics, LLC v. Oklahoma Canes, LLC
as 5:2024cv06040
Plaintiff:
Soar Athletics, LLC
Defendant:
Oklahoma Canes, LLC doing business as Canes, Great Plains
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00969
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Immigration: Review of Denial of Naturalization Application
Stovall v. Henry
as 6:2024cv06035
Plaintiff:
Vandy D. Stovall and Black
Defendant:
Dr Guy Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
