Cases 11 - 20 of 350
Doyle v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
Tracy Doyle
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Counts v. Wasko et al
as 4:2023cv04103
Defendant:
GTL Technology, Kellie Wasko, Brent Fluke and others
Plaintiff:
David L Counts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Christopher v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01873
Plaintiff:
Doyle Christopher
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Doyle v. Yates
as 2:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerel Doyle
Defendant:
John P Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Deckard v. Rutledge, et al
as 5:2023cv05028
Plaintiff:
Frankie Doyle Deckard, Jr.
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe Staff Members, Deputy Megan Rutledge, Lieutenant Tyler Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. Does
as 4:2022cv01124
Plaintiff:
Caleb Doyle
Defendant:
Does Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Payne et al
as 6:2022cv06110
Petitioner:
Doyle Anthony Jones
Respondent:
Dexter Payne and Leslie Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duke v. Lagasse Construction Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
Donald G Duke, Jr
Defendant:
Lagasse Construction Inc, Snider Industries LLC, Smith-Doyle Contractors Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hicks v. Griffin et al
as 4:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Joe Griffin, James Moody, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv01376
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Doyle
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
