Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Jerry McKee v. Asa Hutchinson, et al
as 19-2016
Defendant / Appellee:
Adam Bulter, Prosecuting Attorney, McMillion, Judge, Greene County, Rhonda Thomas, Lt., CID and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jerry McKee
Seever v. Weir, et al
as 4:2019cv00333
Defendant:
Ken Jarnigan, Chief Brad Halsey and Zachary W. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 4:2019cv00320
Defendant:
Brad Halsey, Ken Jarnigan, Zachary W. Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Brian Seever
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKee v. Hutchinson et al
as 3:2019cv00022
Defendant:
Rhonda Thomas, Daniel Stidham, Barbara Halsey and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry McKee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Halsey v. Berryhill
as 4:2017cv01044
Plaintiff:
Lisa Renee Halsey
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Timms et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv01859
Plaintiff:
Janene Timms , Charlene Ault , Darlene Bedford and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ware v. Hunter et al
as 3:2017cv00109
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Ware
Defendant:
Ron Hunter, Barbara Halsey, L D Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Halsey et al v. The Townsend Corporation of Indiana et al
as 1:2017cv00004
Defendant:
The Townsend Corporation of Indiana and Jeff Alan
Plaintiff:
Andrew Halsey and Tammy Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timms et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2016cv00733
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Janene Timms , Charlene Ault , Darlene Bedford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
