Cases 11 - 20 of 962
Figueroa v. Darter et al
as 4:2023cv00871
Plaintiff:
Betty Figueroa
Defendant:
Margaret Darter, Krissy Lewis and Tommy Land
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Figueroa et al v. Driver Control et al
as 4:2023cv00870
Plaintiff:
Sergio Figueroa and Betty Figueroa
Defendant:
Driver Control and Wayne Hamrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Grooms v. Privette et al
as 6:2023cv03287
Defendant:
Alice Bell, Steven A. Privette, Alice Privette and others
Plaintiff:
Betty Grooms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nakakande et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02798
Plaintiff:
Sarah Nakakande, Salome Nakayiza, Damascus Nakhaima and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Kakuru et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02776
Plaintiff:
Solomon Kakuru, Justus Kakuru, Sophia Kakwezi and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
JoAnn Chase, et al v. Andeavor Logistics, L.P., et al
as 23-3019
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JoAnn Chase, Nelson Fredericks, estate of, Inez Burr and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Andeavor Logistics, L.P., Andeavor, formerly known as Tesoro Corporation, Tesoro Logistics GP, LLC and others
Lee et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02672
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee, Jeremiah Lord, Jeremiah Baker and others
Defendant:
3M Company, 3M Occupational Safety, LLC, Aearo Holding, LLC and others
Jenkins v. Segal
as 0:2023cv02404
Plaintiff:
Betty Lee Jenkins
Defendant:
Warden Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Stofferahn et al
as 0:2023cv02386
Plaintiff:
Austin Jeffrey Jones
Defendant:
Anthony C Stofferahn, Robert J Conway, Margaret Astrup and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02375
Plaintiff:
Ricky L. Ward and Betty Ward
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
