Cases 11 - 20 of 204
United States v. Cecil Robinson
as 23-2362
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Cecil Jason Robinson
Philip Petrone, et al v. Werner Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 23-1884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Philip Petrone, Stewart Fisher, Jasbir Singh and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Werner Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Werner Trucking and Drivers Management, LLC
Philip Petrone, et al v. Werner Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 23-1886
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Philip Petrone, Stewart Fisher, Jasbir Singh and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Werner Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Werner Trucking and Drivers Management, LLC
Gaby v. USA
as 2:2023cv02033
Petitioner:
Cecil W. Gaby
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Huntington National Bank v. Automeister II Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
Huntington National Bank
Counter Claimant:
Automeister II Inc.
Defendant:
Cecil McCants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Elliot v. Vinton
as 2:2022cv04174
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elliot
Defendant:
Elly Vinton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Burgess v. St. Joseph Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv06113
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Burgess
Defendant:
St. Joseph Police Department, Harrison, Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cecil Williamson, Jr. v. Mike Heinricy
as 22-3096
Petitioner / Appellant:
Cecil Wallace Williamson, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Mike Heinricy, Warden-IMCC
United States v. Cecil Parker, Jr.
as 22-2905
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Cecil Samuel Parker, Jr.
Ryan Edner v. Michelle Dietrich, et al
as 22-1664
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ryan C. Edner and Ryan Christopher Edner
Defendant / Appellee:
Michelle Dietrich, Judicial Officer, Cecil Naatz, Attorney, Jacob Birkholz, Attorney and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
