Cases 11 - 20 of 339
Reco Manning v. United States, et al
as 23-1799
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reco D. Manning
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Greene v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jamel Ewing Greene
Defendant:
Dewayne Hendrix, Department of Veterans Affairs, FCI Forrest City Compound Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene v. Hendrix
as 2:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Jamel Ewing Greene
Defendant:
John M McHugh and Dewayne Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Brandon Coffey v. Higgins, et al
as 23-1275
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brandon Coffey
Defendant / Appellee:
Higgins, Sheriff, Pulaski County, Calvin, Captain, PCDF, Thompson, Major, PCDF and others
McDonald et al v. Stetson Courier Inc et al
as 4:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Johnny Carroll McDonald, Casey Jackson, Philip Fitzgerald and others
Defendant:
Stetson Courier Inc and John Stetson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Caffey v. Garland et al
as 2:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Eric Lydell Caffey
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Dewayne Hendrix, Sheila Woodard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caffey v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Eric Lydell Caffey
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Dewayne Hendrix, M D Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Cauley et al
as 2:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Mark T Stinson, Sr
Defendant:
K Cauley, Hall, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01182
Plaintiff:
De'Marius Johnson
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01184
Plaintiff:
Laron Evans
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
