Cases 21 - 30 of 433
Norton et al v. Pizza Luce, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv01746
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Norton and Matthew Day
Defendant:
Pizza Luce, Inc., Pizza Luce II, Inc., Pizza Luce III, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lewis Eugene Day v. Anne Precythe, et al
as 23-1833
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lewis Day
Defendant / Appellee:
Anne L. Precythe, Director, Missouri Department of Corrections and Julie Kempker, Director, Missouri Division of Probation & Parole
Cheatwood v. Day et al
as 4:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
James Cheatwood
Defendant:
Linda Day, William John Day and Shawn Hollway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Norris et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Norris, John Rumple, Quashawn Cypress and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Night and Day Furniture, LLC v. Tianjin Mojia E-Commerce Co., Ltd.
as 4:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
Night and Day Furniture, LLC
Defendant:
Tianjin Mojia E-Commerce Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Day v. Precythe et al
as 2:2023cv04009
Plaintiff:
Lewis Eugene Day
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe and Julie Kempker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
United States v. Chandrique Day
as 22-3366
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Chandrique Day
Lordi v. Xu et al
as 4:2022cv00654
Plaintiff:
Susan Lordi doing business as Willow Tree
Defendant:
Cheng Xu, Xiangyu Wei, Huang Sheng Qian and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
