Cases 21 - 30 of 61
Joel Munt v. Paul Schnell, et al
as 20-2117
Defendant / Appellee:
Cheri Mayer, Tom Roy, in his official and individual capacity, Lt. Hills, in official and personal capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joel Marvin Munt
Cowen et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02185
Plaintiff:
William Curtis, II, Kurt Everett Darby, Jack Duncan and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo, LLC, Aearo Holdings, LLC and others
Darling et al v. Boecker et al
as 1:2019cv00011
Defendant:
Justin Boecker, City of Cedar Rapids, Jerry A Vander Sanden and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Massingham, Brian Darling and Brian Hutchcroft-Darling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Munt v. Roy et al
as 0:2019cv00056
Defendant:
Other OPH Mailroom Staff, Jeanne Michels, Eddie Miles and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Marvin Munt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00332
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Weggins et al v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv02027
Plaintiff:
Darius Weggins , Hunter Blakeley , Christopher Peterson and others
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Company , Patriot Pharmaceuticals, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weggins et al v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01251
Plaintiff:
Darius Weggins , Hunter Blakeley , Christopher Peterson and others
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Company , Janssen Research and Development, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darling v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00174
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Darling
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Darling v. USA
as 1:2016cv00149
Plaintiff:
Michael Leroy Darling
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States v. Jennifer Darling
as 16-2520
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Jennifer Darling
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
