Cases 21 - 30 of 136
Edmond v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2020cv00857
Plaintiff:
Michael Edmond
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rochelle v. Ulrich et al
as 4:2020cv04043
Plaintiff:
Edmond Shackleford Rochelle and Ford
Defendant:
Pro Trucking, Inc. and David Ulrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edmond v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00677
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Aundrea Culcalger, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Edmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate et al v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00558
Plaintiff:
Ceclia Tate
Defendant:
Aundrea Culcalger, Does 1-100, Correctional Officers Unnamed, 1-100, Jane and John Does, Wendy Kelley and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Jiles, Jr, Elijah McAlister, A Biddings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv00793
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Edmond McClinton v. Dexter Payne
as 19-3529
Petitioner:
Edmond McClinton
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Miller v. Marshel et al
as 3:2019cv00326
Plaintiff:
Christopher Miller
Defendant:
Trish Marshel, Doyle Ramey, Alex Edmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aris et al v. 3M Company et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2019cv02106
Plaintiff:
Michael Marshall, Bobby Martin, David Caldwell and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Schroeder et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02086
Plaintiff:
Brent Borck, Hughie Boggs, Marcus Alexander and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Carlson v. Saul
as 0:2019cv01900
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Richard Edmond Carlson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
