Cases 21 - 30 of 74
Sargent et al v. United States of America
as 3:2020cv00004
Plaintiff:
Terry Sargent and Jinhong Sargent
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2672 pi
Meierhenry Sargent LLP v. Bradley Williams, et al
as 19-3589
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Meierhenry Sargent LLP, a South Dakota limited liability partnership
Defendant / Appellant:
Bradley Williams and Kerry Williams
Meierhenry Sargent LLP v. Bradley Williams, et al
as 19-3323
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Meierhenry Sargent LLP, a South Dakota limited liability partnership
Defendant / Appellant:
Bradley Williams and Kerry Williams
Carlsen v. Farrington
as 0:2019cv02584
Plaintiff:
Rondual Kirk Carlsen, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark Farrington and Sargent Mark Farrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Silva et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02263
Plaintiff:
Roger Rathbun, Wayne Rosebrock, Matthew Puccini and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Sargent County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv00112
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Rite Aid Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Sargent County
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Pope v. Early et al
as 8:2018cv00455
Defendant:
Captain West, Corporal Grahm, Corpol Estavez and others
Plaintiff:
Mandola M. Pope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sargent v. Arctic Glacier U.S.A., Inc.
as 0:2018cv02697
Plaintiff:
Steven Sargent
Defendant:
Arctic Glacier U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sargent v. TYM Tractors
as 5:2018cv05173
Plaintiff:
Dave Sargent
Defendant:
TYM Tractors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blackstock v. Frakes et al
as 8:2018cv00280
Petitioner:
Jesse Blackstock
Respondent:
Case Manager Coleman, Scott Frakes, Nebraska Department of Correctional Services and others
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
