Cases 21 - 30 of 410
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States v. Donald Shaw
as 23-2169
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Donald L. Shaw
Zachariah Dambrosia-Shaw v. Robert Wakefield, et al
as 23-1915
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Zachariah Dambrosia-Shaw
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert Wakefield, Administrator, Lonoke County Jail, M. Dukes, #1718, Officer in Charge, Lonoke County Jail and Bowers, Deputy/Sheriff, Lonoke County Jail
Shaw v. Clarinda Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Joshua V Shaw
Defendant:
Clarinda Correctional Facility, Scott Heuer and Sgt Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delvin Shaw v. Sgt. John Dailey
as 23-1815
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Delvin L. Shaw
Defendant / Appellee:
Sgt. John Dailey, North Dakota State Penitentiary, official and individual capacity
Wagner et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
James Wagner, Johnathan Wagner, Boyd A. Walker, Jr. and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Judy Shaw Foundation, Inc. v. City of Howard, South Dakota
as 4:2023cv04039
Plaintiff:
Judy Shaw Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Howard, South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Taylor et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
William Taylor, Mario Debarros, Alphadel McKee and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Shaw v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 0:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
Laraysha Shaw
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Christy v. Philips et al
as 4:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Christy
Defendant:
Don Philips, Wapello County Sheriff's Department, Ottumwa Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
