Cases 21 - 30 of 261
Lucus v. Stobaugh et al
as 2:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Tamara Leigh Lucus
Defendant:
John S Stobaugh, John S Stobaugh PA and Schnipper Britton & Stobaugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Webster v. St. Louis County et al
as 0:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
Austin J. Webster
Defendant:
St. Louis County and Tamara S. Lemke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shawn Flowers-Bey v. Robert Webster, et al
as 23-1355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shawn Flowers-Bey
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert Webster, Thomas Cabrera, Miguel Paniagua and others
CASE OPENED IN CASE 4:23-CV-00023.
as 4:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Tamara Sigars
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Softsheen-Carson LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sigars v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Tamara Sigars
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., Softsheen-Carson LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Anderson v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 0:2022cv01651
Plaintiff:
Tamara Anderson
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv01591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Carlile v. Walmart Associates, Inc
as 4:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
Tamara Carlile
Defendant:
Walmart Associates, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1500
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
