Cases 31 - 40 of 158
Dayton v. Lisenbee et al
as 4:2018cv01670
Defendant:
Richard Lisenbee and Matt Shults
Plaintiff:
Douglas E. Dayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Toneworld International Corporation et al
as 0:2018cv02770
Defendant:
Toneworld International Corporation, Dayton Electric Manufacturing Corporation and W.W. Grainger, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Provost v. Christopher
as 4:2018cv00282
Plaintiff:
Dayton Provost
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Defendant:
Jack Christopher, Faculty, Staff Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoekman et al v. Education Minnesota et al
as 0:2018cv01686
Plaintiff:
Linda Hoekman and Deborah York
Defendant:
Education Minnesota , Anoka Hennepin Education Minnesota , National Education Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv01525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Heins v. Jarvey et al
as 4:2018cv00118
Plaintiff:
Dayton Matthew Heins
Defendant:
John A Jarvey, Casey Ritchie, James E Gritzner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heins v. Jarvey et al
as 4:2018cv00063
Petitioner:
Dayton Matthew Heins
Respondent:
John A Jarvey, Casey Ritchie, Federal Public Defender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Piper et al
as 0:2018cv00428
Petitioner:
Guy Greene
Respondent:
Emily Piper , Dayton , Lori Swanson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dayton v. Lisenbee et al
as 4:2017cv02859
Plaintiff:
Douglas E. Dayton
Defendant:
Richard Lisenbee and Matt Shults
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickering v. Thompson et al
as 3:2017cv03074
Plaintiff:
Chad Pickering
Defendant:
Bret Thompson, Jon Morris, Bryan Dayton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
