Cases 31 - 40 of 70
Mengis v. McCorkle et al
as 4:2014cv01934
Plaintiff:
Benyam Mengis
Defendant:
Timothy "Tim" McCorkle, Stella Mezinis, Alan Lynn Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America v. Abernathy et al
as 6:2014cv06107
Plaintiff:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Defendant:
Wade Abernathy, Jr. and Ramona J. Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Abernathy et al
as 4:2014cv04115
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Ray Abernathy and Nelly's of Genoa, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
DIRECTV, LLC v. Montes et al
as 4:2014cv04113
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, LLC
Defendant:
Jesus Montes, Ray Abernathy and Nelly's LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Matthews et al v. Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00979
Plaintiff:
Charlene Matthews, Felicita Vazguez, Jason Russell and others
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care North America, Inc., Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Federal Trade Commission v. Abernathy Motor Company et al
as 3:2014cv00063
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Abernathy Motor Company, Wesley Abernathy and David Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
United States v. Gary Abernathy
as 14-1186
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Gary Abernathy
Roosevelt Abernathy v. Ray Hobb
as 14-1023
Petitioner:
Roosevelt Abernathy
Respondent:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Abernathy v. Hobbs
as 5:2013cv00264
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Abernathy
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Abernathy v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 0:2013cv01363
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Abernathy
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.