Cases 31 - 40 of 3,130
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McNealy v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00583
Plaintiff:
Matthew McNealy
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, Jennifer Clemons-Abdullah and Jaclyn Rattler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keita v. Huckell et al
as 0:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Mamady Kalifa Keita
Defendant:
Scott Huckell, Matthew Russell, Jonanthan C. Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Philos Mechanical, LLC v. Fairbanks et al
as 0:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Philos Mechanical, LLC
Defendant:
Matthew Fairbanks, Jason Damman, Colin Beere and others
Counter Claimant:
Joseph Sellers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ames v. Chisago County et al
as 0:2024cv01397
Plaintiff:
James Ames
Defendant:
Chisago County, Adam Cinelli, Matthew Jacobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeremy Dunn, et al v. Shane Penfield, et al
as 24-1804
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dunn and Kevin Love
Defendant:
Shane Penfield, in his official and individual capacities, Penfield Law Firm Professional LLC, Marty Jackley, in his individual capacity and others
Sapa v. Eminem et al
as 4:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sapa
Defendant:
Eminem, Hollywood and St. Louis FBI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
