Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Scott et al v. BJC Health
as 4:2011cv00633
Plaintiff:
Walter F. Scott and Jarvis Simms
Defendant:
BJC Behavioral Health, Ellen Depker, Vinita Park Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 0:2011cv00462
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Hayes
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 4:2010cv02355
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Hayes
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DePauw v. Jordan et al
as 1:2010cv00071
Plaintiff:
Charles DePauw
Defendant:
John Jordan, Ruth Ann Dickerson, J. P. Mulcahy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Veselsky et al
as 4:2009cv00207
Plaintiff:
Rafael A. Jones
Defendant:
Joseph Veselsky, Darrel Hall, Unknown Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Veselsky et al
as 4:2009cv00209
Plaintiff:
Rafael A. Jones
Defendant:
Joseph Veselsky, Darrel Hall, Unknown Newsome and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tyler v. Jones et al
as 8:2008cv00307
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Defendant:
Unknown Jones and Unknown Prantz
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Grace v. Jones
as 4:2008cv00620
Plaintiff:
William Grace, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown Jones, Unknown King and Unknown Allen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cooks v. Ahmed et al
as 4:2008cv00136
Plaintiff:
Gary Allan Cooks
Defendant:
Unknown Ahmed, Unknown Jones, Unknown Snow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester Krupp, Jr., et al v. Susan Singer, et al
as 08-1190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lester F. Krupp, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Tyler D. Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
Susan Singer, Dr., Unknown Jones, Nurse, St. Louis Justice Center, criminal and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
