Cases 31 - 40 of 13,431
William Hill v. United States
as 24-2023
Petitioner:
William Thomas Hill
Respondent:
United States of America
Monderen v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kenneth Monderen, Sr.
Defendant:
William Stange, Latonia Young-Griffin, Timothy Seabaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickinson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01808
Plaintiff:
William Dickinson
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Tix v. Tix
as 0:2024cv01824
Plaintiff:
Kristin Ann Tix
Defendant:
Robert William Tix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Seadorf v. Damante et al
as 2:2024cv02035
Plaintiff:
Arthur William Seadorf, Sr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Jim Damante, Officer Jonathan Stroud and Booking Officer Reed Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washell v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01773
Plaintiff:
William Washell
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Stark et al v. K&C Specialties Corp. et al
as 0:2024cv01762
Plaintiff:
Painters and Allied Trades Labor Management Cooperation Initiative, the, Jeff Stark, Nick Nowak and others
Defendant:
K&C Specialties Corp. and James Isaac Spinks
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Terrell v. Does
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
William Lee Terrell
Defendant:
Does Unknown Agents, Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays et al v. Schroeder et al
as 0:2024cv01736
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Mays and Tommy Holmes
Defendant:
Andrew William Schroeder, Mark Joseph Suchta, Alan Douglas Salvosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
