Cases 41 - 50 of 525
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kimery v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00803
Plaintiff:
Fielding Vaughn Kimery
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James G Gibson, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Williams et al
as 4:2023cv00766
Plaintiff:
Corey Johnson
Defendant:
Johnny L Williams, Leonadus Ollie Reddick and Brandon Carrol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gates v. Payne
as 4:2023cv00758
Plaintiff:
Jason Gates
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll Electric Cooperative v. Alltel Corporation
as 23-2770
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carroll Electric Cooperative Corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
Alltel Corporation
Carroll v. Provident Life and Casualty Insurance Company
as 0:2023cv02269
Plaintiff:
Thomas Carroll
Defendant:
Provident Life and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
United States v. Judy Carroll
as 23-2741
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Judy Lynn Carroll
Cody Obama v. Gibson et al
as 4:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
Steven Ishmael Xander Cody Obama
Defendant:
James Gibson, Brandon Carroll, Roosevelt G Barden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Gibson et al
as 4:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Cordarious Willis
Defendant:
James Gibson, Brandon Carroll, Roosevelt G Barden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. Gibson et al
as 4:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
Tony Ruiz
Defendant:
James Gibson, Brandon Carroll, Roosevelt G Barden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
