Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Campbell v. Cameron et al
as 5:2015cv00049
Plaintiff:
James Campbell
Defendant:
Roger Cameron, Ronald Chism and Arkansas Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chism v. Knight et al
as 5:2014cv00383
Plaintiff:
Cody J Chism
Defendant:
Veodis D Knight, Terrie L Banister, R G Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chism v. Griswold et al
as 5:2014cv00377
Plaintiff:
Cody J Chism
Defendant:
Lasonya Griswold, Estella Bland, William Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ayala et al v. Mission Group Kansas, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00885
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Ayala , Jennifer Decker , Christi Hampton and others
Defendant:
Mission Group Kansas, Inc. , Board of Directors of Mission Group Kansas, Inc. , John Mucci and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGraw v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2014cv00107
Plaintiff:
Ramon Hosea McGraw
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Roger Cameron, Chism and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chism v. United States of America
as 4:2014cv00285
Petitioner:
Vincent A. Chism
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chism v. United States of America
as 4:2012cv01821
Petitioner:
Vincent A. Chism
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Chism v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2012cv03105
Plaintiff:
Taira Chism
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bridget Chism v. MetLife Home Loan
as 12-6042
Debtor:
In re: Bridget Chism
Debtor - Appellant:
Bridget Chism
Movant - Appellee:
MetLife Home Loans, a division of MetLife Bank N.A.
Joel Baker, et al v. Martin Marietta Materials, et al
as 12-1256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joel Baker, Kathy Baker, Margaret L. Barnett and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., Hunt Martin Materials, LLC, Material Transport Company and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
