Cases 41 - 50 of 247
Allen Beaulieu v. Clint Stockwell, et al
as 21-3833
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Allen Beaulieu, individually doing business as Allen Beaulieu Photography
Defendant / Appellee:
Clint Stockwell, an individual, Thomas Martin Crouse, an individual, Charles Willard Sanvik, an individual, also known as Chuck and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv02127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. City of Brooklyn Center et al
as 0:2021cv01913
Plaintiff:
Aurora Thessaly Adams
Defendant:
City of Brooklyn Center, Officer John Doe #1, Officer John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Iverson v. City of Brooklyn Center et al
as 0:2021cv01903
Plaintiff:
Bjorn Iverson
Defendant:
City of Brooklyn Center, Officer Doe #1 Officer John, Officer John Doe # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garner v. Keen et al
as 4:2021cv00998
Plaintiff:
Oscar Garner
Defendant:
Daniel Keen, John Doe-1, John Doe-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Fuwell et al
as 1:2021cv00103
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
Taylor Fuwell, Heather Tidwell, Heather Annesser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blakemore v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2021cv00841
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Blakemore, III
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, John Doe 1-2, John Doe 3-6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vandyke v. McDowell et al
as 4:2021cv00160
Plaintiff:
Robert Vandyke
Defendant:
Wapello County Iowa, Derek Shaw, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
Whittaker v. Doe #1 et al
as 4:2021cv00549
Defendant:
Susan Doe, John Doe #1, Jean Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Whittaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Keen et al
as 4:2021cv00534
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo J. Williams
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, John Doe 3, Daniel Keen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
