Cases 51 - 60 of 4,908
Daniel Wilson v. Shane Jones, et al
as 24-2327
Defendant:
Shane Jones, Sheriff, Pope County, Cunningham, Sergeant, Pope County Detention Center, S. Watzle, Lieutenant, Pope County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wilson
Lee v. Hicks et al
as 0:2024cv02468
Defendant:
Amber Suronen, Kevin Barnes, Octavia Powell and others
Plaintiff:
Abraham Sigurd Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03180
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. St. Louis County Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00880
Defendant:
Amanda B. McNulley and St. Louis County Missouri
Plaintiff:
Karen Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. US Department of Veterans Affairs
as 4:2024cv04115
Defendant:
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff:
Brad Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2267
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Marques Tavron v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 24-2275
Defendant:
White, W/M, C.O., E.A.R.M.U., ADC, B. King, Sgt., E.A.R.M.U., ADC, Kentara Coleman, C.O., E.A.R.M.U., ADC and others
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
DaShotta/Datran Lion/Jones v. Moses Jackson, et al
as 24-2276
Defendant:
Tyrone Allison, Major Restrictive Housing (Max), EARU, ADC, Moses Jackson, Warden/Supervisor, EARU, ADC and Christopher Johnson, Deputy Warden, Restrictive Housing (Max), EARU, ADC
Plaintiff:
DaShotta/Datran Lion/Jones
United States v. Yusuf Jones
as 24-2262
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Yusuf John Jones
Mencin v. City of Troy Police et al
as 4:2024cv00852
Defendant:
Gary Leifert, David Norman, Ron Sconce and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mencin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
