Cases 51 - 60 of 75
Jennings v. CCS Medical Staffing et al
as 5:2014cv00038
Plaintiff:
Justin Jennings
Defendant:
CCS Medical Staffing and Obi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodley v. Nwanne et al
as 2:2014cv00012
Plaintiff:
William Lee Woodley
Defendant:
Obi Okoye Nwanne and Geraldine Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ware v. Obi et al
as 2:2013cv00157
Plaintiff:
George Ware
Defendant:
Obi, Debra Horton, Wendy Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McAlphin v. Obi et al
as 2:2013cv00145
Plaintiff:
James McAlphin
Defendant:
N Obi, Ball, G Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Obi et al
as 2:2013cv00144
Plaintiff:
Jerry A Brown
Defendant:
Obi, Isom, Christina M Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton et al v. Corizon Health Inc et al
as 5:2013cv00263
Plaintiff:
Larry G Dukes and Candace Y Hinton
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc, Corizon Inc, AllCare Correctional LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Gilliam et al v. Kelly et al
as 2:2013cv00103
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Gilliam, III
Defendant:
Wendy L Kelly, Angela Gamble, Candace C Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Long, Jr. v. Nwannem Obi, et al
as 13-1750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Long, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Nwannem Okoye Obi, Doctor, C.M.S., East Arkansas Regional Unit, Geraldine Campbell, A.P.N., C.M.S., East Arkansas Regional Unit, Debra Horton, Health Services Administrator, C.M.S., E.A.R.U. and others
Tatom v. Corizon Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Ricky Barnard Tatom, Sr
Defendant:
Corizon Inc, Gordon, Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owen v. USA et al
as 2:2012cv00220
Plaintiff:
James Leon Owen, Jr
Defendant:
USA, Timothy C Outlaw, D W Heuett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
