Cases 61 - 70 of 2,114
Elliott v. Garrett
as 2:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
John N Elliott
Defendant:
C Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Su v. Dignity Home Care Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv00465
Defendant:
M'Moupientila N'kenon N'da, Dignity Home Care Inc. and Marc N
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Holtcamp v. Faust et al
as 2:2023cv04209
Plaintiff:
Jackie L Holtcamp
Defendant:
Susan Faust, Robert Fleming, Valerie Huhn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Anderson Companies, LLC et al
as 0:2023cv03246
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Anderson Companies, Oak Hill 7100, LLC, Julie N Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
ninety n ninety, LLC v. City of Hopkins, Minnesota
as 0:2023cv03224
Plaintiff:
ninety n ninety, LLC
Defendant:
City of Hopkins, Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
James Thompson, III v. Paul Schnell, et al
as 23-3193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Charles Thompson, III
Defendant / Appellee:
Paul Schnell, Commissioner of Minnesota Prisons, Jeffrey T. Titus, Warden, G. Besonen, Lt. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
