Cases 61 - 70 of 1,128
United States v. Alexander Curry-Fishtorn
as 23-3134
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Alexander Martin Curry-Fishtorn
McCoy v. Woods et al
as 4:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Hudson, Tompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
von Brandenfels v. LTL LED, LLC
as 0:2023cv02813
Plaintiff:
Alexander von Brandenfels
Defendant:
LTL LED, LLC doing business as Wolf River Electric
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Alexander Palomarez v. Teresa Bittinger
as 23-3071
Petitioner:
Alexander Schroder Palomarez
Respondent:
Teresa L. Bittinger, Warden
Mujuni et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02802
Plaintiff:
Richard Mujuni, Bright Twambale, Moses Taremwa and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Alexander v. PurFoods, LLC
as 4:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY ALEXANDER
Defendant:
PURFOODS, LLC and PurFoods, LLC doing business as Mom's Meals
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0052 Federal Trade Commission Act
Douglas et al v. PurFoods, LLC
as 4:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DOUGLAS, DOROTHY GOODON, Clyde Burry and others
Defendant:
PURFOODS, LLC and PurFoods, LLC doing business as Mom's Meals
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0052 Federal Trade Commission Act
Harmon v. Downing et al
as 4:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
Howard E. Harmon
Defendant:
Alexander L. Downing, Unknown Wells, Unknown Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canada v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02704
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Paul Schnell, Andrew Karlsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackerman et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02686
Plaintiff:
Alexander Ackerman, Jorge Ibrain Adrian, Jose Dimas Alfaro and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
