Cases 61 - 70 of 127
Withers v. Beebe et al
as 4:2012cv00044
Plaintiff:
James Lee Withers
Defendant:
Mike Beebe and Larry B Norris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2012cv00041
Plaintiff:
Lee Rae Moore
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Mike Beebe and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glassco et al v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2011cv00860
Plaintiff:
Anton D Glassco and Jerome A James, II
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Mike Beebe , Arkansas Economic Development Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimmy Cantrell v. Mike Beebe, et al
as 11-2993
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jimmy Shane Cantrell
Defendant - Appellee:
Mike Beebe, Governor of Arkansas, Dustin McDaniel, Attorney General of Arkansas, City of Little Rock and others
James Marlin v. Governor Mike Beebe
as 11-2875
Petitioner - Appellant:
James Mathew Marlin
Respondent - Appellee:
Governor Mike Beebe, State of Arkansas
Hopson v. Beebe et al
as 4:2011cv00608
Plaintiff:
Charles Hopson
Defendant:
Mike Beebe, Tom Kimbrell, Jerry Guess and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gloria Crawford v. Van Buren County, et al
as 11-1943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gloria Jean Crawford, doing business as JC Kennels
Defendant - Appellee:
Van Buren County, Arkansas, Debby Fogle, Van Buren County Animal Control Officer, Debby Fogle and others
Jon Mills v. Mike Beebe, et al
as 11-1697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jon Mills
Defendant - Appellee:
Mike Beebe, Governor of Arkansas, John Doe, County Judge, Saline County, City of Benton, Arkansas, Mayor's Office and others
Mills v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2011cv00052
Plaintiff:
Jon Mills
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Larry May, Todd Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
