Cases 61 - 70 of 1,445
United States v. Jeremy Woods
as 23-3238
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jeremy Ace Woods
Ames v. Ennis et al
as 5:2023cv05171
Plaintiff:
Donald Lesley Ames, Jr.
Defendant:
Parole Officer Emily Ennis, Mark Bernthal, Brenda Marshal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02887
Plaintiff:
Travis Woods
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Rebolloso v. Woods Construction and Development, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Jose Raul Rebolloso
Defendant:
Woods Construction and Development, Inc. and Seth Woods
Wood v. Gowdy et al
as 4:2023cv00551
Plaintiff:
Blake Wood
Defendant:
Eric Gowdy and Thorne's Tree Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Houston Oliver v. United States
as 23-2737
Petitioner / Appellant:
Houston Oliver, also known as Hollywood, also known as Wood, also known as Willie
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Colon et al v. Millennia Housing Management, Ltd
as 4:2023cv00527
Plaintiff:
Maya Colon, Candice Foxworthy, Demario Mack and others
Defendant:
Millennia Housing Management and BVA Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Midtling et al v. United States of America
as 0:2023cv02701
Plaintiff:
James Midtling and Patricia Wood-Midtling
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Recovery of IRS Tax
Partee v. Lewis et al
as 4:2023cv01119
Defendant:
John Doe, Steven Lewis, Michael K. Mullen and others
Plaintiff:
Shelton Partee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
