Cases 71 - 80 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv05005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Roger Clark, Sr. v. Pamela Blevins, et al
as 09-3423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Roger Lee Clark, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Pamela Kay Blevins, Asst. P.A., Dwight K. Scroggins, Jr. and Sadie Wilson
Clark v. Kellogg et al
as 5:2009cv06127
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Clark, Sr.
Defendant:
Daniel Kellogg and Pamela Kay Blevins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Blevins et al
as 5:2009cv06103
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Clark, Sr.
Defendant:
Pamela Kay Blevins, Dwight K. Scroggins, Jr. and Sadie Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoeber v. Scroggins et al
as 5:2009cv06052
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Hoeber
Defendant:
Dwight K. Scroggins, Jr., Diana Lynn Hensley, Scott Coates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blevins v. Astrue
as 3:2008cv05091
Plaintiff:
Ebony Blevins
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Blevins v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2008cv03066
Plaintiff:
Donna Blevins
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Adams et al v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 0:2008cv06037
Plaintiff:
Cherrie Adams, Cherrie Adams, Cherrie Adams and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and AstraZeneca LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Blevins v. Larry Sanders, et al
as 6:2008cv06036
Plaintiff:
Corey Lamont Blevins
Defendant:
Larry Sanders and Mel Steed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
